I don’t know about you, but the whole Global Warming talk has me concerned. However, it is probably not for the reason you would suspect. Please, read on.
There can be no doubt that the Earth’s temperature has fluctuated over time. We know this from scientific as well as anecdotal recordings throughout history. Only recently have we felt compelled to raise an alarm, if not panic, over these minor and survivable variations.
Based on fairly reliable data, we know that the Earth’s temperature was somewhat higher before the Middle Ages. During the Middle Ages, the temperatures went down considerably. Then, they came back up. During the 1800’s we encountered what was called a mini-Ice Age.
These fluctuations in temperatures and the media coverage of theses fluctuations were documented in a United States Senate floor speech delivered by Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) on September 25, 2006, entitled “Hot & Cold Media Spin Cycle: A Challenge to Journalist Who Cover Global Warming.” Senator Inhofe sagely noted:
Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age.
From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.
In my own memory, I have noted just what the Senator was talking about. For instance, I was taught during my elementary school years in the 1970’s by my well-informed science teachers that we were headed for another Ice Age. Then, less than twenty years later we are told by equally well-informed science teachers and researchers that we are NOW heading into a major period of Global Warming. Not just Global Warming, but MAN-MADE Global Warming. Nevermind that the data is sketchy, that the alleged culprit, CO2, has failed to produce the extreme temperatures predicted by all of the models, and that the sun has decided it was going to pursue another cycle of cooling right in the midst of the Global Warming hysteria.
I point out all of this to demonstrate how thin the so-called proof for either Global Warming or the new Ice Age really is. I believe we can all agree that temperatures are always in a flux. The Sun undergoes various cycles that we do not know about or understand. There are processes at work in our environment that have never been documented well, much less incorporated into any Global Warming model. Most glaringly, no Global Warming model adequately calculates how precipitation would affect the alleged rise in temperature. Wait a minute, and hear me out. We are taught that heat causes water to evaporate, which leads to cloud formation and precipitation. If you have ever been outside on a summer day and it starts raining, the temperature drops dramatically. Wouldn’t it stand to reason that increased heat just MIGHT cause increased precipitation. The precipitation, in turn, would have a cooling effect. However, no model accounts for the variations in temperature caused by this heating and cooling cycle generated by precipitation.
Just in the last few weeks, we have heard of a team headed into the Arctic prove that ice levels are diminishing becoming trapped in a major spring snow and ice storm. Any time Al Gore makes an appearance to preach about Global Warming, the weather turns freakishly cold. In a recent article, we learned that a rapid growth spurt in sea ice formation brought sea ice levels to the same level as existed in 1979. Does this mean that we have suddenly erased nearly thirty years of Global Warming’s alleged effects on global sea ice levels? Additionally, despite predictions that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008, instead the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. A noted researcher with the University of Illinois’s Arctic Climate Research Center, Bill Chapman, indicated that the increase in sea ice ”was due in part to colder temperatures in the region.” I just had to include this line so that you would see the mysterious science at work here – notice that he does not hold back anything – the new ice was due “in part to colder temperatures in the region.” WOW. I do not claim to be a scientist, but even I could have predicted that colder weather causes ice formation.
For my part, I have determined that I will not accept Global Warming until after the Ice Age. I am sorry, but I have to go in the order that the competing theories were presented. If we were taught in the 1970’s that an Ice Age was imminent, then we should have an Ice Age before Global Warming can logically occur. Regardless to what Gore and other alarmists predict, we must proceed in an orderly manner. After all of the media gyrations on the subject since the turn of the century, they should simply remain silent until there is a definitive answer. They have been consistently wrong on this subject long enough.